0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Adaptive pathways for critical infrastructure resilience

 Adaptive pathways for critical infrastructure resilience
Auteur(s): , ,
Présenté pendant IABSE Symposium: Construction’s Role for a World in Emergency, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10-14 April 2024, publié dans , pp. 277-285
DOI: 10.2749/manchester.2024.0277
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.23 MB

Climate change is triggering hazard events more frequently and the costs of the consequences on the built environment are higher. This induced the advent of resilience-based engineering. More recen...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (École Spéciale des Travaux Publics, ESTP, Paris, France)
(James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK)
(Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Symposium: Construction’s Role for a World in Emergency, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10-14 April 2024
Publié dans:
Page(s): 277-285 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
Page(s): 277-285
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
DOI: 10.2749/manchester.2024.0277
Abstrait:

Climate change is triggering hazard events more frequently and the costs of the consequences on the built environment are higher. This induced the advent of resilience-based engineering. More recently adaptive pathways (APs) were presented to allow adaptive management as well as dynamic and flexible decision-making. APs allow, specifically in climate change contexts, the consideration of stressors that occur incrementally or cumulatively and amplified hazard scenarios. Thus, an AP framework enhanced with emerging technologies is proposed for critical infrastructure. It benefits from the resilience and sustainability of emerging technologies throughout the lifetimes of critical infrastructure. This advanced AP framework is supported by continuous assessment of the infrastructure performance, continuous monitoring, and implementation of mitigation measures if needed. The Hollandse Bridge case study is offered to demonstrate the framework.